The planet, life and humanity, need input from all of us to rescue and save them from the clutches of exploitative and ruthless Zionist capitalism. It's now or never. "Hunger is war: The bones of children of the great capitals dawn glued to the cement, some woven into human clusters to warm wind of indifference, others stabbed: the retina dead and looted the body. The early mornings and cold Cold the eyes of the .. ". Today, a dove flies sick, his eyes wander about the world frays in distresses, pieces of flesh left on the splinters Widgets archival documents Automatic Classification Libraries digital collections documentation guidelines dissemination Economy Economy-Periodicals. Export documents found Input Extract Metadata 3.0 HDD competitive intelligence electronic health records Malvinas Digital Preservation Museums Collect Paleography Resources found intelligence software manipulation of text set Terioas Thesauri Uncategorized Velneo technological surveillance. Order of May 30, 1959 by approving a-Mutual-Guecho, Socorrros Society of Mutual Building trade, established in Algorta (Vizcaya), its new bylaws, insurance model of Occupational Accidents and. Resolution of the Directorate General of Registries and Notaries in the administrative remedy filed by the Notary of Guecho Ignacio Beristain and Mary Unzueta against the refusal of the Registrar of the Property to register a escr Guernica. Municipal architect. – Announcement on the merits announces call for the provision of vacancy in the City of Guecho. PDF (Reference 1957/17252). Directorate General of Posts and Telecommunications. – Advertising auction to hire the construction of the building for Postal Services and Telecommunications in Getxo (Vizcaya). PDF (Reference 1956/13140). Before beginning to comment on such laws or bills, etc.., Would be interesting to clarify some concepts that serve as benchmarks to cover what is the interdiction or opposition of such draft law SOUP, PIPA and the closure of megauplad as events relating to the criminalization increasingly widespread in intellectual property. Piracy Act (Act cease to online piracy) or HR Act. 3261, is a bill like the PIPA Act (Protect Act or IP Hey that happened to me a little something, see what you think. I was looking for some videos on youtube and I busccado before closing to see if there was a new team video, and I found a Fly on the Moor, a town of Leon where we were last year and that was very cool, because we act on Friday night and Saturday afternoon, and also ran a sprint mini motorbike that was sugarcane. we got very good memories from there. Well as I was saying, it occurred to me that we do not do a lot from everyone here colgues links to videos of the team, whether from youtube or any other site where we can see them. Remember that videos can not hang here, we can only put the link that leads to another site where you posted the video in question, ok?. Model are a bit special because we Rainers friends prepare them specifically, so I think it is a prize cane, do you think?. Ah! Not valid video links repeated, ie someone who had made them as before, only valid the first. The term will be until 16 March at 12 midnight. I feel great contest, and how I want those boots for me (hehe.) Then leave the second video of the concentration of penguins as being the most recent and including flip!. In Villa de Castro, if Zith, is that it is difficult These are the legal commentary of the text that senators proposed speakers to present at the second reading of Bill 241 of 2011 for which the liability of service providers in relation to copyright infringements. Article 1. Purpose: To regulate the liability of Internet service providers, for offenses committed by others on their systems or networks, establishing an effective procedure for the protection referred to copyright and neighboring rights on the Internet. Internet service providers. Intermediaries are in Colombia established technology that allow both access, the connection or interconnection to data networks such as transmission, storage, processing or routing data messages through the same networks as well as service providers that allow access, hosting, publishing, routing and searching of content and information in the form of message data to the data network, such as the Internet. Other service providers are considered. Access providers, interconnection, transmission or routing of data: Those service providers that operate a data google display network or self-employed or who provide access or interconnection to its network or to other networks and the transmission or routing of messages data generated or provided by third party users. Service providers or automatic storage buffer (cache): Those service providers that store data in their systems automatically, provisional and temporary, with the sole purpose of making more efficient the onward transmission of such data to other recipients of service. Service providers hosting data: Those suppliers that, by itself or through third parties, store data at the request of third party users, or available to third party users of technology platforms that allow the storage of data messages for later access or transmission over data networks. Providers of liaison services, search and directory contents or information: Those providers that provide search services, linkage and / or reference to third-party content or information that exists within a data network through the use of various technological resources search engines, hyperlinks, links and directories that refer to information content or format of data messages or include on their own sites or platforms, link directories or search engines to these effects. Repeat offender: Any person who has been criminally convicted two or more times for committing an infringement of copyright or related rights. The article defines a repeat offender. According to the text, a repeat infringer is someone who has been convicted of a criminal court twice or más.Pros: Conviction legal certainty. The ISP does not have the burden of deciding who will be considered a repeat offender; Cons: The law seems to indicate that copyright infringements will be penalized, because it takes the decision of a criminal court to determine whether a particular user is an infringer Repeatedly; This article should have a definition of who is a "content provider" because it repeatedly refers to him in the articles on ISP liability in infringing content and procedure and proceed to order precautionary measures. Given the importance of the nature of the offender should be clearly definido.Ciertamente is better to have a clear definition of a recidivist, and is preferably determined by a conviction in a criminal proceeding for a violation of copyright, it is definitely better have this discretion in the hands of a judge. Above this are several questions:. How do you know that a person is an offender?, Given that the standard is set by the quality of convicted in a criminal trial. The concept of repeat infringer means that the ISP must have a database, where rest the IP address, user name, download, and so on. It should be noted that in Colombia under the Constitution Article 15, there is a right of Habeas Data, the project generates the question of how it will control the use of these databases by the suppliers. Likewise, the draft Act 1273 unknown 2009 and mentioned in the law 1266 of 2008, as the importance of the new law is constitutional in control. It should then consider the problems that would own a record of offenders (more in Colombia even though there is not even a record for child molesters). From this point of view should be considered the problems, the effectiveness and efficiency of a concrete as the applicability of this test was a repeat offender. While the drafters of this project are intended to implement expeditious mechanisms for the protection of copyright and neighboring rights, must observe the character he seeks to give access to the Internet, but even if pending in Congress on Draft Agreement Legislative 05, 2011 which is already approved in the first debate1, and seeks to provide Internet access as a fundamental right, a matter of great importance, and certainly know the honorable senators. Precisely for this purpose should review motivos2 exposure and texto3. This observation is necessary given that one of the possible penalties for infringement of copyright and related rights prescribed by the current project is the termination of accounts. eg Articles paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Article 13. Article 3. No general obligation of supervisión.Los Internet service providers will not, for purposes of this Act, the obligation to monitor the data they transmit, store or relating to, or obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating activities constitute infringements of copyright and rights conexos.Lo established in the preceding paragraph shall be without prejudice to the competent judicial authority to order Internet service providers to perform some specific activity and temporarily within the scope of its competence and According to the rules that have to operate for any court order, in order to investigate, detect and prosecute crimes or any infringement of copyright or related rights. Although otherwise provided in this article there will be no obligation to monitor data providers, other articles of the draft if they speak of repeat users, and suggest that the ISP is exempt deresponsabilidad did not initiate transmission. The non-initiation of transmission by the ISP, they understand how to cut, stop talking about recidivism contenido.Para must have prior control, the control is done with database records and user profiles. Article 4. Exclusion of liability of service providers Internet.Sin prejudice the general rules of liability applicable in the case of those breaches of copyright and related rights committed by third parties that take place through systems or networks controlled or operated by individuals or legal entities that provide some of the services indicated in the following articles, the suppliers will not be responsible under the terms of this Act, to the extent they meet the conditions provided in the following articles to limit such liability, as the nature of the service prestado.En these cases, providers of Internet services may only be subject to precautionary measures and court referred to in Articles 12, 13, 14 and 15 of this Act 5. Providers of data transmission, routing, or providing service providers conexiones.Los data transmission, routing or providing connections will not be held responsible for the data transmitted on condition that the provider:. Do not modify or select the content of the transmission. For these effects are not considered an alteration of the content, material handling technology necessary to facilitate the transmission through the network, as the division of packages,. Adopting and reasonably implementing a policy, which establishes the circumstances under which the service provider may use the power under the clause of termination or suspension of the contract with content providers in the event that these are repeat offenders, under the terms of this Act, the rights protected by copyright or related rights. Since recurrence is also associated with the termination of the Internet in this article is essential to note that in Colombia under the Constitution and the Law 1273, the only way to intercept data, through a court order, he who without a warrant to intercept data on its origin, destination or within a computer system, or electromagnetic emissions from a computer system that transport is punishable with imprisonment of thirty-six (36) to seventy-two (72) meses.Por this makes perfect sense that recidivism is associated with a conviction as does the new text. However, if there is no flexibility for ISPs on recidivism define what should be consecrated in this article is to be included in the policy that the disengagement will only judicial.Asà same sentence should unify the text of because the same provision is repeated in Article 6 (f), 7 (h) and 8 (h) for different types of ISPs, definitely if it withdraws from the hands of the ISP the criteria to establish who is or is not a recidivist , it is logical that the "policies" referred to this article are clearly identified, otherwise, the termination or suspension of the service is still held by the service provider, while the latter will define, citing the project, "circumstances" why will the termination or suspension, but even considering that it is not clear what will be the method used to know a repeat offender. Paragraph. In cases that have met the requirements of this section, the judge may order as a precautionary measure or by a judgment, the adoption of reasonable measures to block access to a particular site-specific non-domestic online or terminating specified accounts . Article 6. Providers of temporary storage conducted through a process automático.Los service providers to temporarily store data in an automated procedure performed for the sole purpose of making more efficient the information's onward transmission to other recipients of service shall not be considered responsible for data stored on the condition that the supplier:. Do not modify or select the content of the transmission. For these effects are not considered an alteration of the content, material handling technology necessary to facilitate the transmission through the network, as the division of packages,. Respect the terms of user access and the rules regarding the updating of the material stored temporarily (Caching) established by the provider of the site of origin, according to a standard communication protocol generally accepted by industry for the system or network by which that person is making the material,. Do not interfere with the consistent and standardized technology used in the source site for information on using material stored online. Removing or disabling access to expeditiously stored material has been removed or to which access has been disabled in your place of origin, when receiving a request for withdrawal in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 9 of this law. Adopting and reasonably implementing a policy, which establishes the circumstances under which the service provider may use the power under the clause of termination or suspension of the contract with content providers in the event that these are repeat offenders, under the terms of this Act, the rights protected by copyright or related rights. Paragraph. In cases that have met the requirements of this section, the judge may order as a precautionary measure by judgment or the removal or disabling access to infringing material that is clearly identified by him and / or termination of certain accounts of Violators of the service provider, which are clearly identified by the applicant, whose owner is using the system or network to make an infringing activity to copyright or related rights. Article 7. Storage Service Providers at the user's material residing on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service. Service providers that store a user's request, personally or through third parties, data on your network or system will not be responsible for the content stored on condition that the supplier:. Do not modify or select the content of the transmission. For these effects are not considered an alteration of the content, material handling technology necessary to facilitate the transmission through the network, as the division of packages,. Do not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in cases where it has the right and ability to control such activity;. Publicly designating a representative and an appropriate means to receive requests for withdrawal or disqualification of offending material apparently laid down in Articles 8, 9, 10 and 11. Adopting and reasonably implementing a policy, which establishes the circumstances under which the service provider may use the power under the clause of termination or suspension of the contract with content providers in the event that these are repeat offenders, under the terms of this Act, the rights protected by copyright or related rights. Paragraph. In cases that have met the requirements of this section, the judge may order as a precautionary measure by judgment or the removal or disabling access to infringing material that is clearly identified by him and / or termination of certain accounts of Violators of the service provider, which are clearly identified by the applicant, whose owner is using the system or network to make an infringing activity to copyright or related rights. Article 8. Providers of services consisting of referring or linking users to an online location using information location tools, including hyperlinks and directorios.Los service providers who perform services of searching, linking and / or reference to a website line using information location tools, including hyperlinks and directories will not be held liable for any data stored or referenced provided that the supplier:. Do not modify or select the content of the transmission and not select the recipients of information. (Unless the event, in which referring or linking users to an online location using information location tools, including hyperlinks and directories involved in some form of self-selection). For these effects are not considered an alteration of the content, material handling technology necessary to facilitate the transmission through the network, as the division of packages,. Do not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in cases where it has the right and ability to control such activity;. Publicly designating a representative and an appropriate means to receive requests for withdrawal or disqualification of offending material apparently laid down in Articles 8, 9, 10 and 11. Adopting and reasonably implementing a policy, which establishes the circumstances under which the service provider may use the power under the clause of termination or suspension of the contract with content providers in the event that these are repeat offenders, under the terms of this Act, the rights protected by copyright or related rights. Paragraph. In cases that have met the requirements of this section, the judge may order as a precautionary measure by judgment or the removal or disabling access to infringing material that is clearly identified by him and / or termination of certain accounts of Violators of the service provider, which are clearly identified by the applicant, whose owner is using the system or network to make an infringing activity to copyright or related rights. Article 9. Procedure for detection and removal of contenidos.En contracts between Internet service providers and users of their services, should stipulate the obligations of States to refrain from unlawful conduct of copyright and related rights, as terms and conditions the provision of that service. Also, the service provider may reserve the right to remove or disable any material made available by the user through their service, and that is the subject of the application referred to in Article 9 of this Ley.Los service providers Internet may be incorporated in the contracts of general clauses of termination or suspension of contracts for breach of copyright and related rights which must be controlled in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of service providers Consumidor.Si , adopt these provisions in their contracts so that your users know and accept previously, provided the other requirements laid down in Articles 5, 6 and 7, and acting in good faith, remove or disable access to material claimed alleging breach or apparent, shall be exempt from liability for any claims resulting from an infringement of copyright and rights conexos.El service provider, prior to removal of allegedly infringing material, you should take reasonable steps promptly to report withdrawal requests or Disabling the alleged infringer making the material available on its system or network, in accordance with the provisions of Article 10 of this Act 10. Application requirements inhabilitación.Las retirement or withdrawal requests or disqualification of contents, which under the previous article made the copyright holders or related rights, or their respective representatives, should at least consider the following requirements: . Include the identity, address, phone number, email address of the owner of copyright or related rights, or their representatives respectively. The right holder or his representative must be domiciled or resident in Colombia and, where appropriate, have enough power to be subject to summons on behalf of the owner,. They attach information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider identify the work or protected by copyright or related rights, which is allegedly being used without appropriate authorization, and identifying where the URL for the alleged infringing content,. They attach the URL and any other information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the allegedly infringing material that resides on a system or network controlled or operated by this or this, which is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access be disabled,. Make the right holder or his representative a statement saying that you have a good faith belief that use that is being given to material with the permission of the copyright holder or connected, the representative, who is entitled to grant such approval or legislation,. Be signed by the person making the request for withdrawal or disqualification. For this purpose the signature transmitted as part of an electronic communication satisfies the requirement described. Paragraph. Whoever knowingly provides false information concerning alleged violations of the rights recognized in this law, shall indemnify the damage caused to any interested party, whether such damages are the result of actions that the network service provider take based on the information . Article 11. Notice, Counter and Retiro.Recibida request for withdrawal or disqualification and verified compliance with the requirements of the preceding article, the internet service providers shall communicate this fact to the content provider within three (3) days receipt of the application with the background provided by the allegedly infringed right holder or his representative, and informing the content provider the term that has to respond, and the possibility that it has voluntarily removing allegedly infringing content. Upon receipt of notification from Internet service provider, the provider of allegedly infringing content may within five (5) calendar days to voluntarily withdraw the content or ask the Internet service provider to keep the material in its system or network, without prejudice to the holder of copyright or related to the provider present a court order under which the material in the application must be removed or inhabilitado.Si the service provider receives a communication from the content provider on the terms set forth in the following article, you must not remove or disable the allegedly infringing content, not if it means losing the benefits of exemption from liability for infringement of copyright or the rights conexos.En event that the request for service does not have all the requirements and precedents set in the preceding article. Service providers at no time can make value judgments of the removed material, or to rule on the legality or illegality of it. Article 12. Elements of response to the request for withdrawal or inhabilitación.Los requirements, the response to the request for withdrawal or disqualification should be in written or electronic communication that includes the following:. A statement in which the alleged violator agrees to be subject to orders of any judicial authority of his domicile, or if the address is outside the territory of the party, any other judicial authority with jurisdiction anywhere in the territory of the where the service provider may be found, and in which a claim for the alleged infringement of copyright or related rights may be filed,. The signature of the person making the request for restoration of the removed material or disabled. For this purpose the signature transmitted as part of an electronic communication satisfies the requirement described. Authorization should not be required to deliver personal information to the applicant, first because definitely coerces the user to provide personal information so that the response to the request is valid, and secondly, because this requirement must be authorized by a judge, either this is personal information. It is understood that some project proponents claim that this information is necessary to contact the alleged infringing user in order to initiate a process, but ultimately that's the role of judge and the judge must apply the information in the process keeping Case reserves and establishing the conditions under which información.No deliver that is allegedly infringing the user to hide, or that there is impunity in the claim for damages by the applicant. It is the handling of personal information is always mediated by the judge. Is not justification to require such authorization to avoid literal control judicial.El